Catalogue & product data
The system of record for products: attributes, variants, media and the rules that keep them consistent across channels. Everything downstream inherits the quality of this layer.
Four layers beneath the storefront, and the audit that decides whether any of them need work.
We work below the storefront, where catalogues, stock and integrations decide whether the shop above them can function at scale.
The system of record for products: attributes, variants, media and the rules that keep them consistent across channels. Everything downstream inherits the quality of this layer.
Shop, warehouse, ERP and payment provider exchanging data reliably — including the difficult half, which is what happens when one of them is unavailable.
The logic that decides what is sellable, at what price, deliverable when. It is the part customers notice instantly when it is wrong.
Classification, attribute extraction, description drafting and duplicate detection across large catalogues. Used where it removes measurable manual hours — and not used where a rule is cheaper.
Four things we decline, stated up front.
If we cannot measure the manual effort before, we cannot honestly claim to have reduced it after.
Design refreshes on unfixed data postpone the problem at your expense.
The product model, code and documentation are yours. No hosted black box you cannot leave.
We do not price a platform project before measuring the data. Numbers produced that way are fiction.
Measure first, model second, build third. Reordering those is the usual reason platform projects overrun.
Real data, measured. Cheap, fast and frequently decisive.
The product structure, agreed in writing before code exists.
In slices that go live independently, so value arrives before the project ends.
Monitoring, reconciliation and an honest count of the manual work removed.
Four stages. The first one frequently ends the project, which is a good outcome delivered early.
We take an export of the real catalogue and measure it: missing attributes, inconsistent units, duplicates. It is usually worse than anyone expected and always better to know now.
A product model that survives new categories and new channels without a rebuild. Get this wrong and every later problem traces back to it.
Interfaces with real error handling and a reconciliation path, so a failed sync surfaces as an alert rather than as a customer complaint.
Throughput, error rates and the manual hours actually removed. If AI did not reduce them, we say so rather than presenting activity as progress.
Illustrative audit dimensions — not a customer report
Rarely, and not as the main event. We work on the catalogue, integration and logic layers beneath. Plenty of shops have an excellent storefront sitting on data that cannot support it.
Classifying products into categories, extracting attributes from supplier documents, drafting descriptions for review and finding duplicates across large catalogues. All of those have a measurable before and after.
Anywhere a deterministic rule is cheaper and more predictable, and anywhere a wrong answer would ship to a customer without a human seeing it first.
Usually one to two weeks. It is deliberately cheap, because its job is to tell you honestly whether a bigger project is warranted.
The client. Source code and documentation transfer with the engagement, with no licence held back.
Registered in Cyprus, delivering across the EU, in English and German.
Send an export and the number of products. An audit answers more in two weeks than a workshop does in two months.